WILSON BOWDEN DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED

• ·

  Negative shareholders' funds

Values shown as filed in the company's annual accounts. — indicates the figure wasn't present under that line item in that period. The Δ column is the change from the prior filed period as a percentage of |prior|; lines a company doesn't report show —. Year-on-year comparison hidden: this filing covers about 12 months versus 12 months prior. About these numbers

Margins divide P&L lines by turnover. Gearing is liabilities over total assets. Current ratio is current assets over creditors falling due within one year. Interest cover is operating profit over absolute finance costs. Margin ratios are hidden where reported turnover is too small relative to profit to yield a meaningful figure — typical of holding companies whose income is mostly subsidiary dividends rather than trading revenue. Sector-distribution context coming next.

1. WILSON BOWDEN DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED 1999-09-17 → present
2. WILSON BOWDEN PROPERTIES LIMITED 1987-01-28 → 1999-09-17
3. BOWDEN PARK HOLDINGS LIMITED 1969-02-20 → 1987-01-28

Accounting basis

FRS 102

Reporting scope

Standalone (parent only)

Auditor

UHY Hacker Young

Audit opinion

Unqualified (clean)

Going concern

Affirmed

“Accordingly, the Directors consider there to be no material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt on the Group's ability to continue to operate as a going concern. They have formed a judgement that there is a reasonable expectation that the Group and Company have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, being at least 12 months from the date of signing of these financial statements. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in the preparation of these financial statements.”

Group structure

1. WILSON BOWDEN DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED · parent
   1. Ash Tree Court Management Company Limited 0% · England and Wales
   2. Infinity Park Derby Management Limited · England and Wales
   3. Interlink Park Management Company Limited 0% · England and Wales
   4. Meridian Business Park Extension Management Company Limited 2% · England and Wales
   5. Nottingham Business Park Management Company Limited 2% · England and Wales
   6. Nottingham Business Park (Orchard Place) Management Company Limited 2% · England and Wales
   7. Optimus Point Management Company Limited 0% · England and Wales
   8. Riverside Exchange Management Company Limited 22% · England and Wales
   9. WBD (Chesterfield Management) Limited 17% · England and Wales
   10. WBD (Chesterfield) Plot Management Company Limited 25% · England and Wales
   11. WBD (Kingsway Management) Limited · England and Wales
   12. WBD (Riverside Exchange Sheffield B) Limited 100% · England and Wales
   13. WBD Riverside Sheffield Building K Limited 100% · England and Wales
   14. Willow Farm Management Company Limited 2% · England and Wales

Significant events

• “The Company has traded satisfactorily throughout a challenging financial year, however results have been severely impacted by ongoing issues at legacy properties requiring an additional £78.2m provision to be set aside for addressing external wall systems and associated issues, in particular, an unexpected obligation that was identified on 21 February 2025 in respect of fire safety-related issues at a development in our Southern region. The remediation and associated cost with respect to the four buildings on this site are estimated to be £76.4m.”
• “In May 2025, the Group won a landmark Supreme Court case which clarified the responsibility of companies in the supply chain for remediating defects in developments they were involved in.”

Auditor, going-concern and subsidiary information is drawn from the narrative of the latest annual accounts. About these numbers

Filings

3

last 12 months

Capital events

0

last 24 months

Officers appointed

0

last 12 months

Officers resigned

2

last 12 months

Direct counts from the register. No score, no rating — see the Filing timeline for the underlying events.